Integrating the melanoma 31-gene expression profile test with surgical oncology practice within national guideline and staging recommendations

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: Define changes in clinical management resulting from the use of the prognostic 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test for cutaneous melanoma in a surgical oncology practice. Patients & methods: Management plans for 112 consecutively tested patients with stage I-III melanoma were evaluated for duration and number of clinical visits, blood work and imaging. Results: 31-GEP high-risk (class 2; n = 46) patients received increased management compared with low-risk (class 1; n = 66) patients. Test results were most closely associated with follow-up and imaging. Of class 1 patients, 65% received surveillance intensity within guidelines for stage I-IIA patients; 98% of class 2 patients received surveillance intensity equal to stage IIB-IV patients. Conclusion: We suggest clinical follow-up and metastatic screening be adjusted according to 31-GEP test results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyams, D. M., Covington, K. R., Johnson, C. E., Plasseraud, K. M., & Cook, R. W. (2021). Integrating the melanoma 31-gene expression profile test with surgical oncology practice within national guideline and staging recommendations. Future Oncology, 17(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-0827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free