Mapping power and jurisdiction on the internet through the lens of government-led surveillance

11Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Facing the fragmentation of digital space in the aftermath of the Snowden revelations, this article considers regulatory models available to avoid the balkanisation of the internet. Considering government-led surveillance in particular, available strategies are investigated to create a trustworthy and universal digital space, based on human rights principles and values. After analysis and discussion of salient aspects of two relevant proposals, it is submitted that the lack of a common understanding of concepts makes global regulation unlikely. Nevertheless, a possible alternative to universal frameworks and national regulation might be the creation of ‘blocs of trust’, established through international conventions.

References Powered by Scopus

Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action

251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence

182Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bentham, Deleuze and Beyond: An Overview of Surveillance Theories from the Panopticon to Participation

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Balancing privacy rights and surveillance analytics: a decision process guide

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regulatory arbitrage and transnational surveillance: australia’s extraterritorial assistance to access encrypted communications

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gstrein, O. J. (2020). Mapping power and jurisdiction on the internet through the lens of government-led surveillance. Internet Policy Review, 9(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1497

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

60%

Arts and Humanities 2

20%

Computer Science 1

10%

Engineering 1

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free