Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: The BOND-2 study

388Citations
Citations of this article
157Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of concurrent administration of two monoclonal antibodies, cetuximab and bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: This was a randomized phase II study in patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer. All patients were naïve to both bevacizumab and cetuximab. Patients in arm A received irinotecan at the same dose and schedule as last received before study entry, plus cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, then weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2, plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg administered every other week. Patients in arm B received the same cetuximab and bevacizumab as those in arm A but without irinotecan. Results: Forty-three patients received cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan (CBI) and 40 patients received cetuximab and bevacizumab alone (CB). Toxicities were as would have been expected from the single agents. For the CBI arm, time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7.3 months and the response rate was 37%; for the CB arm, TTP was 4.9 months and the response rate was 20%. The overall survival for the CBI arm was 14.5 months and the overall survival for the CB-alone arm was 11.4 months. Conclusion: Cetuximab and bevacizumab can be administered concurrently, with a toxicity pattern that seems to be similar to that which would be expected from the two agents alone. This combination plus irinotecan also seems to be feasible. The activity seen with the addition of bevacizumab to cetuximab, or to cetuximab plus irinotecan, seems to be favorable when compared with historical controls of cetuximab or cetuximab/irinotecan in patients who are naïve to bevacizumab. © 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

References Powered by Scopus

Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer

9688Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2006

5607Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan- refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

4796Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy

2527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer

1814Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colorectal cancer

1379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saltz, L. B., Lenz, H. J., Kindler, H. L., Hochster, H. S., Wadler, S., Hoff, P. M., … Chen, H. X. (2007). Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: The BOND-2 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(29), 4557–4561. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0949

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 54

51%

Researcher 33

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 78

67%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0