Rule by Natural Reason: Late Medieval and early Renaissance conceptions of political corruption

  • Barcham M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper argues that, from about the eleventh century CE, a new and distinctive model of corruption accompanied the rediscovery and increased availability of a number of classical texts and ideals, particularly those of Cicero and the Roman Jurists. This new model of corruption accompanied a renewed emphasis on classical ideals in theorising the political, and a subsequent change in the way in which political life was conceived in Europe. Combining the medieval Christian focus on the importance of moral values with the classical emphasis on the value of reason, this tradition merged political and moral reason such that they became conceptually identical and indistinguishable from one another. The polity was thus seen as a Christian community living under laws agreed on through reason, ruled on behalf of the common good by a ruler who was bound and constrained by these same laws. In this new conceptual model, corruption was perceived largely in terms of the adverse consequences of action occurring without regard to natural reason, in contrast with the previous Augustinian approach that had viewed our entire earthly life as corrupt and without possibility of redemption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barcham, M. (2012). Rule by Natural Reason: Late Medieval and early Renaissance conceptions of political corruption. In Corruption: Expanding the Focus. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/cef.09.2012.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free