Common Pitfalls Using the Normalized Compression Distance: What to Watch Out for in a Compressor

  • Alfonseca M
  • Cebrián M
  • Ortega A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using the mathematical background for algorithmic complexity developed by Kol- mogorov in the sixties, Cilibrasi and Vitanyi have designed a similarity distance named normalized compression distance applicable to the clustering of objects of any kind, such as music, texts or gene sequences. The normalized compression distance is a quasi-universal normalized admissible distance under certain conditions. This paper shows that the compressors used to compute the normalized compression distance are not idempotent in some cases, being strongly skewed with the size of the objects and window size, and therefore causing a deviation in the identity property of the distance if we don’t take care that the objects to be compressed fit the windows. The relationship underlying the precision of the distance and the size of the objects has been analyzed for several well-known compressors, and specially in depth for three cases, bzip2, gzip and PPMZ which are examples of the three main types of compressors: block-sorting, Lempel-Ziv, and statistic

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alfonseca, M., Cebrián, M., & Ortega, A. (2005). Common Pitfalls Using the Normalized Compression Distance: What to Watch Out for in a Compressor. Communications in Information and Systems, 5(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.4310/cis.2005.v5.n4.a1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free