The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions revisited

43Citations
Citations of this article
172Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previously we showed that network-based modelling of brain connectivity interacts strongly with the shape and exact location of brain regions, such that cross-subject variations in the spatial configuration of functional brain regions are being interpreted as changes in functional connectivity (Bijsterbosch et al., 2018). Here we show that these spatial effects on connectivity estimates actually occur as a result of spatial overlap between brain networks. This is shown to systematically bias connectivity estimates obtained from group spatial ICA followed by dual regression. We introduce an extended method that addresses the bias and achieves more accurate connectivity estimates.

References Powered by Scopus

A default mode of brain function

10053Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations

8716Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri

8053Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimising network modelling methods for fMRI

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individual-Specific Areal-Level Parcellations Improve Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining Individual-Specific Functional Neuroanatomy for Precision Psychiatry

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bijsterbosch, J. D., Beckmann, C. F., Woolrich, M. W., Smith, S. M., & Harrison, S. J. (2019). The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions revisited. ELife, 8. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44890

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 63

54%

Researcher 41

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 59

66%

Psychology 15

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0