A Robust Predictive Control Design for Nonlinear Active Suspension Systems

108Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel method for designing robust nonlinear multivariable predictive control for nonlinear active suspension systems via the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy approach. The controller design is converted to a convex optimization problem with linear matrix inequality constraints. The stability of the control system is achieved by the use of terminal constraints, in particular the Constrained Receding-Horizon Predictive Control algorithm to maintain a robust performance of vehicle systems. A quarter-car model with active suspension system is considered in this paper and a numerical example is employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The obtained results are compared with those achieved with model predictive control in terms of robustness and stability.

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy Identification of Systems and Its Applications to Modeling and Control

17729Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms

6415Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptive sliding-mode control for nonlinear active suspension vehicle systems using T-S fuzzy approach

704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Improved optimal sliding mode control for a non-linear vehicle active suspension system

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disturbance observer based Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy control for an active seat suspension

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

T–S fuzzy model predictive speed control of electrical vehicles

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bououden, S., Chadli, M., & Karimi, H. R. (2016). A Robust Predictive Control Design for Nonlinear Active Suspension Systems. Asian Journal of Control, 18(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1180

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

11%

Researcher 3

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 25

96%

Energy 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0