Applying lean thinking to the structure and delivery of a kinematics course

5Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The proper application of lean management techniques to manufacturing processes typically results in process improvements. Many of the principles of lean thinking can also be applied to the educational process. This paper examines the implementation of lean management principles in the design and delivery of a traditional lecture-based engineering course - Kinematics of Machines. The format of a typical kinematics course relies on lectures, homework, exams, and perhaps a design project as a means for transferring knowledge from the instructor to the students. In this paper, lean thinking principles are applied to redesign the kinematics course format to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the knowledge transfer process. Because kinematics is taught in a common engineering course format, the model presented in this paper is transferrable to a number of other engineering courses. This paper demonstrates that the implementation of lean thinking at the course level does not require the development of new pedagogical techniques, but rather the proper use and arrangement of existing methods. The first step in modifying the structure of the kinematics course is to build the course around course outcomes rather than course topics. Five outcomes were identified for the kinematics course. A corresponding outcomes-based grading format (specifications grading) was then applied as a means for measuring the student progress through the course. Exams and partial credit grading were eliminated from the course format to remove interruptions and defects from the course flow. Course content was flipped with notes and minilectures placed on the learning management system for the course. This made the course content continuously available to students, allowing them to move at their own pace. Classroom meetings focused on active student engagement with students working on assignments and projects, maximizing their ability to interact with one another and the professor. Student response to the course, obtained via an end of the course survey, indicates a positive reaction to the course that is consistent with the observed behavior of the students during the course. Students favored the mini-lecture videos over live presentation of course material, with many students viewing any given video multiple times. Students took advantage of the outcome based assignments to progress at their chosen rate, with several students finishing the course one or two weeks prior to the end of the term.

References Powered by Scopus

Application of lean thinking to health care: Issues and observations

310Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Engineering instructional development: Programs, best practices, and recommendations

227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementation of lean construction techniques for minimizing the risks effect on project construction time

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Specifications Grading at Scale: Improved Letter Grades and Grading-Related Interactions in a Course with over 1,000 Students

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The lean prescription for non-traditional adult learners

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Delving into the Design and Implementation of Specifications Grading Systems in Higher Education

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mirth, J. A. (2017). Applying lean thinking to the structure and delivery of a kinematics course. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2017-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--27603

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

42%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

25%

Computer Science 3

25%

Chemistry 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0