Maximizing the benefit-cost ratio of anthracyclines in metastatic breast cancer: Case report of a patient with a complete response to high-dose doxorubicin

6Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the clinical efficacy of anthracycline agents such as doxorubicin, dose-limiting cardiac toxicities significantly limit their long-term use. Here, we present the case of a 33-year-old female patient with extensive metastatic ER+/PR+/HER2- mucinous adenocarcinoma of the breast, who was started on doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide therapy after progressing on paclitaxel and ovarian suppressor goserelin with aromatase inhibitor exemestane. The patient was comanaged by cardiology, who carefully monitored measures of cardiac function, including EKGs, serial echocardiograms, and profiling of lipids, troponin, and pro-BNP every 2 months. The patient was treated with the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane, and changes in cardiac markers [e.g. decreases in ejection fraction (EF)] were immediately addressed by therapeutic intervention with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril and beta-blocker metoprolol. The patient had a complete response to doxorubicin therapy, with a cumulative dose of 1,350 mg/m2, which is significantly above the recommended limits, and to our knowledge, the highest dose reported in literature. Two and a half years after the last doxorubicin cycle, the patient is asymptomatic with no cardiotoxicity and an excellent quality of life. This case highlights the importance of careful monitoring and management of doxorubicin-mediated cardiotoxicity, and that higher cumulative doses of anthracyclines can be considered in patients with ongoing clinical benefit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shee, K., Kono, A. T., D’Anna, S. P., Seltzer, M. A., Lu, X., Miller, T. W., & Chamberlin, M. D. (2016). Maximizing the benefit-cost ratio of anthracyclines in metastatic breast cancer: Case report of a patient with a complete response to high-dose doxorubicin. Case Reports in Oncology, 9(3), 840–846. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free