Ten-day versus 14-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy for second-line anti- Helicobacter pylori eradication in Taiwan

17Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Second-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication with fluoroquinolone-containing triple therapy is one of the recommended treatment options, but neither 7-day nor 10-day regimens provide >90% success rates. The current retrospective study aimed to clarify the effects of 10-day and 14-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapies for second-line H. pylori eradication in a Taiwanese cohort and to evaluate the potential clinical factors influencing eradication. A total of 200 patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the standard triple therapy were prescribed with either a 10-day (EAL-10) or a 14-day (EAL-14) levofloxacin-containing triple therapy group (levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily). Follow-up studies to assess treatment response were carried out 8 weeks later. Eradication rates attained by EAL-10 and EAL-14 were 75.6%; 95% CI = 63.9 -85.3% and 92.5%; 95% CI = 84.5 -98.1%, P = 0.002 in the per protocol analysis and 68%; 95% CI = 56.6 -78.5% and 86%; 95% CI = 76.8 -93.4%, P = 0.002 in the intention-to-treat analysis. The duration of H. pylori therapy is the independent risk factor of H. pylori eradication (P = 0.003). In conclusion, 14-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy can provide a >90% H. pylori eradication rate, but 10-day treatment duration may be suboptimal. The longer duration of H. pylori therapy (14 days) is the independent risk factor. © 2013 Wei-Chen Tai et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tai, W. C., Chiu, C. H., Liang, C. M., Chang, K. C., Kuo, C. M., Chiu, Y. C., … Chuah, S. K. (2013). Ten-day versus 14-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy for second-line anti- Helicobacter pylori eradication in Taiwan. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/932478

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free