Cognitive aspects of ageing and product interfaces: Interface type

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Twelve users with a range of ages between 20 and 70, were assessed for their cognitive capabilities and degree of experience with microwave cooker features and then trialled with two microwaves, one with a dials interface and the other with a buttons interface. The users were provided with a set of tasks to complete with each microwave. It was hypothesised that all users would perform better with the dials model but that the difference in performance between dials and buttons would become more pronounced as age increased. This was found to be the case in comparing the performance from the trials, with the strongest correlation occurring between the users age and the time taken to complete the tasks. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

References Powered by Scopus

The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?

4783Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Industry perceptions to inclusive design - A comparative study

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Designing inclusive ICT products for older users: Taking into account the technology generation effect

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of cognitive ageing on use of complex interfaces

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Attitudes towards Attention and Aging: What Differences between Younger and Older Adults Tell Us about Mobile Technology Design

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, T., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, P. J. (2007). Cognitive aspects of ageing and product interfaces: Interface type. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4554 LNCS, pp. 731–740). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_81

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Researcher 4

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

36%

Design 3

27%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Engineering 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free