Using high-performance quantitative NMR (HP-qNMR®) for certifying traceable and highly accurate purity values of organic reference materials with uncertainties <0.1 %

73Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) in combination with metrological weighing is optimised to demonstrate the power of the qNMR measurement method. It is shown that with 1H-qNMR it is possible to certify the purity of organic reference materials (expressed as mass fraction) with relative expanded uncertainties of <0. 1 % for a 95 % confidence interval (k = 2). Following well-defined selection criteria, a set of twelve different chemical compounds is evaluated and certified to serve as internal references for 1H-qNMR measurements. A series of comparison measurements is made amongst a subset of the selected compounds. The purity of maleic acid is determined by six different 1H-qNMR measurement series, and all results show full consistency. All the six mean values are covered within the range of ±0. 05 %. In two more measurement series, four different nuclei are analysed within the same sample against one calibrator. Even with non-optimised signal intensity ratios and varying signal pattern, a high consistency was obtained. Therefore, the validity and robustness of 1H-qNMR measurement results are demonstrated. 1H-qNMR measurement results are directly traceable to a variety of internationally accepted primary reference materials, and therefore, traceability to SI units is obtained. All experiments are performed under ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO Guide 34 accreditation. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weber, M., Hellriegel, C., Rück, A., Sauermoser, R., & Wüthrich, J. (2013). Using high-performance quantitative NMR (HP-qNMR®) for certifying traceable and highly accurate purity values of organic reference materials with uncertainties <0.1 %. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 18(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-012-0944-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free