Measuring What Matters: Standardized Versus Customizable Impact Measurement Tools

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Tharani addresses critical management decisions for implementing high-quality impact measurement that relates to choosing the right tool for the right purpose. She introduces standardized, customizable, and hybrid approaches to impact measurement, and systematically analyzes the benefits and limitations of each approach. Her analysis draws on collaborative testing of all three approaches with multinational corporations from different industries. In addition, she reflects on their suitability for meeting different impact measurement objectives, such as reporting on sustainability impacts, enabling organizational learning, improving sustainability management systems, and supporting strategic decision making within companies. Tharani offers actionable recommendations for when to use each kind of approach and what to consider when interpreting the results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tharani, A. (2019). Measuring What Matters: Standardized Versus Customizable Impact Measurement Tools. In Business and the Sustainable Development Goals: Measuring and Managing Corporate Impacts (pp. 75–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16810-0_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free