Answering complex questions by combining information from curated and extracted knowledge bases

22Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Knowledge-based question answering (KB-QA) has long focused on simple questions that can be answered from a single knowledge source, a manually curated or an automatically extracted KB. In this work, we look at answering complex questions which often require combining information from multiple sources. We present a novel KB-QA system, MULTIQUE, which can map a complex question to a complex query pattern using a sequence of simple queries each targeted at a specific KB. It finds simple queries using a neural-network based model capable of collective inference over textual relations in extracted KB and ontological relations in curated KB. Experiments show that our proposed system outperforms previous KB-QA systems on benchmark datasets, ComplexWebQuestions and WebQuestionsSP.

References Powered by Scopus

GloVe: Global vectors for word representation

26891Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge

4392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation

4121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neural, symbolic and neural-symbolic reasoning on knowledge graphs

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conversational question answering: a survey

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ARL: An adaptive reinforcement learning framework for complex question answering over knowledge base

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhutani, N., Zheng, X., Qian, K., Li, Y., & Jagadish, H. V. (2020). Answering complex questions by combining information from curated and extracted knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.nli-1.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

75%

Researcher 6

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 30

75%

Linguistics 5

13%

Engineering 4

10%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free