Local peace governance in post-war Timor-Leste: reconceiving governance ambiguity as a formalised political unsettlement

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article makes a new contribution to understanding peace governance, using the concept of formalised political unsettlements to explain enduring local governance ambiguities as a constructive, rather than detrimental, feature of a hybrid post-war political order. Drawing on original fieldwork, the article examines the contested interactions between an international governance reform programme and competing national and sub-national political actors in post-war Timor-Leste. International donors to and scholars of Timor-Leste have argued that an institutional ‘gap’ between national and local governance blocked post-war development and democratisation. I take a new approach, using the concept of ‘formalised political unsettlement’ to reconceive this ‘gap’ as a political space allowing competing visions of post-war governance to co-exist. I demonstrate that the ‘gap’ was not a failure of governance, but a form of transitional political order, sustaining peace while avoiding a formal resolution. In attempting to fix the ‘gap’, the international intervention had unexpected consequences in this complex post-war environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, C. Q. (2022). Local peace governance in post-war Timor-Leste: reconceiving governance ambiguity as a formalised political unsettlement. Peacebuilding, 10(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1955516

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free