Biochemical Studies on Oral Toxicity of Ricin: V: The Role of Lectin Activity in the Intestinal Absorption of Ricin

19Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to investigate a possible role of lectin activity of ricin in its absorption from the small intestine, we prepared two ricin derivatives. BMH-ricin, prepared by crosslinking A and B chains of ricin with 1,6-bismaleimidohexane, was nearly non-toxic but the lectin activity was unaltered. And, NBS-ricin, prepared by the oxidation of tryptophanyl residues of ricin with N-bromosuccinimide, was not only non-toxic but also non-lectinic. After the oral administration of ricin derivatives to rats, their interaction with the digestive tract and absorption into the circulatory systems have been compared with those of ricin, immunochemically and histologically. It was shown by immunostaining that ricin and BMH-ricin could bind to the intestinal mucosa, whereas NBS-ricin could not. No appreciable damage in the small intestine from rats treated with either BMH-ricin or NBS-ricin has been observed, in contrast to ricin treatment where severe impairment of the small intestinal tissues resulted after 5 h. Immunoreactive ricin in the liver has been determined with the ricin enzyme immunoassay (EIA). When compared at 48 h after oral administration, NBS-ricin was not detected, whereas BMH-ricin was found to be 38/ig/liver and ricin 100/ig/liver. From these results, it was inferred that the lectin activity of ricin plays an important role in the absorption of ricin from the small intestine and that the absorption of ricin protein was enhanced by its high toxicity. © 1992, The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishiguro, M., Matori, Y., Tanabe, S., Kawase, Y., Sekine, I., & Sakakibara, R. (1992). Biochemical Studies on Oral Toxicity of Ricin: V: The Role of Lectin Activity in the Intestinal Absorption of Ricin. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 40(5), 1216–1220. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.40.1216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free