How Students Use Statistical Computing in Problem Solving

9Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As the demand for skilled data scientists has grown, university level statistics and data science courses have become more rigorous in training students to understand and utilize the tools that their future careers will likely require. However, the mechanisms to assess students’ use of these tools while they are learning to use them are not well defined. As such, a framework to assess statistical computing actions was created. Using task-based interviews of students who completed a second course in statistics, the framework was used to determine the ways in which students utilize statistical computing tools, specifically R, while going through problem solving phases. Patterns that emerged are discussed. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

References Powered by Scopus

Computational thinking

4891Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics

230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computing in the statistics curricula

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Think-Aloud Interviews: A Tool for Exploring Student Statistical Reasoning

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tensions and synergies in arts-integrated data literacy instruction: Reflections on four classroom implementations

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integrating Computing in the Statistics and Data Science Curriculum: Creative Structures, Novel Skills and Habits, and Ways to Teach Computational Thinking

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woodard, V., & Lee, H. (2021). How Students Use Statistical Computing in Problem Solving. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(S1), S145–S156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1847007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

52%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

19%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 9

56%

Mathematics 3

19%

Engineering 2

13%

Psychology 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free