Differentiating acute Q fever from infections caused by other pathogens is essential. We conducted a retrospective case–control study to evaluate differences in clinical signs, symptoms, and outcomes for 82 patients with acute Q fever and 52 control patients who had pneumonia, fever and lower respiratory tract symptoms, or fever and hepatitis, but had negative serologic results for Q fever. Patients with acute Q fever were younger and had higher C-reactive protein levels but lower leukocyte counts. However, a large overlap was found. In patients with an indication for prophylaxis, chronic Q fever did not develop after patients received prophylaxis but did develop in 50% of patients who did not receive prophylaxis. Differentiating acute Q fever from other respiratory infections, fever, or hepatitis is not possible without serologic testing or PCR. If risk factors for chronic Q fever are present, prophylactic treatment is advised.
CITATION STYLE
Keijmel, S. P., Krijger, E., Delsing, C. E., Sprong, T., Nabuurs-Franssen, M. H., & Bleeker-Rovers, C. P. (2015). Differentiation of acute Q fever from other infections in patients presenting to hospitals, the Netherlands. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 21(8), 1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2108.140196
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.