Differentiation of acute Q fever from other infections in patients presenting to hospitals, the Netherlands

18Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Differentiating acute Q fever from infections caused by other pathogens is essential. We conducted a retrospective case–control study to evaluate differences in clinical signs, symptoms, and outcomes for 82 patients with acute Q fever and 52 control patients who had pneumonia, fever and lower respiratory tract symptoms, or fever and hepatitis, but had negative serologic results for Q fever. Patients with acute Q fever were younger and had higher C-reactive protein levels but lower leukocyte counts. However, a large overlap was found. In patients with an indication for prophylaxis, chronic Q fever did not develop after patients received prophylaxis but did develop in 50% of patients who did not receive prophylaxis. Differentiating acute Q fever from other respiratory infections, fever, or hepatitis is not possible without serologic testing or PCR. If risk factors for chronic Q fever are present, prophylactic treatment is advised.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keijmel, S. P., Krijger, E., Delsing, C. E., Sprong, T., Nabuurs-Franssen, M. H., & Bleeker-Rovers, C. P. (2015). Differentiation of acute Q fever from other infections in patients presenting to hospitals, the Netherlands. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 21(8), 1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2108.140196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free