Restrospective Methods of Estimating Individual Feed Costs

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accuracies of four retrospective estimates of lactation feed cost were evaluated from 167 Holsteins in first lactation fed two mixed rations plus 1.8 kg alfalfa hay. Actual feed cost was regressed on each of the estimates. Method 1 (squared correlation .81) equated lactation feed cost to .43 of the milk value. Method 2 (.86) assigned a fixed cost, $.06 per Mcal, of estimated net energy (lactation) intake. Intake was estimated from body weight and production of the animal and National Research Council requirements for maintenance, production, and growth. Method 3 (.86) estimated lactation feed cost as a proportion of average actual feed cost. Methods 2 and 3 were superior to Method 1 because they also accounted for variation of maintenance and growth of cows. Method 4 (.92) was similar to Method 2 but allowed cost per megacalorie to vary, accounting for the differential cost of the two rations. Milk yield accounted for a substantial proportion of variation in actual feed cost, whereas accounting for maintenance and growth requirements and for differential proportion of grain in the mixed ration, each increased the accuracy of predicting actual feed cost by 5 and 6%. © 1982, American Dairy Science Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coffey, E. M., Pearson, R. E., Douglass, L. W., & Miller, R. H. (1982). Restrospective Methods of Estimating Individual Feed Costs. Journal of Dairy Science, 65(7), 1311–1317. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82345-X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free