‘Complexifying’ our approach to evaluating educational development outcomes: bridging theoretical innovations with frontline practice

11Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Increasing instructional quality in higher education is a key goal of educational development (ED) work, yet demonstrating complex outcomes remains challenging and lacks practical guidance. Evaluating ED services often relies on a reductionist approach characterized by linear assumptions of causal pathways to measure the extent to which instructional outcomes have been achieved and uses proxies such as short-term participant satisfaction. This paper advances a complexity-informed approach for guiding the evaluation of complex outcomes of ED services across individuals and activities within institutions that is adaptable across institutional contexts. To do this, we position the need for innovation in evaluation approaches within current ED literature and practice, and outline key implications of four complexity principles for guiding our approach. Then we describe an iterative process for developing and implementing the evaluation approach within a larger Centre for Teaching and Learning self-study. We describe the transferability of the evaluation approach to contexts beyond the study, and conclude with theoretical, practical, and methodological implications for evidence-based decision-making and strategic planning of ED work.

References Powered by Scopus

Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions

599Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Significant conversations and significant networks-exploring the backstage of the teaching arena

240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Faculty development participants' experiences of working with change in clinical settings

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The development and psychometric properties of an educational development impact questionnaire

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A mixed-methods study of the effectiveness and perceptions of a course design institute for health science educators

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller-Young, J., & Poth, C. N. (2022). ‘Complexifying’ our approach to evaluating educational development outcomes: bridging theoretical innovations with frontline practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(4), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1887876

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

31%

Arts and Humanities 2

15%

Environmental Science 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0