The future of the implantable defibrillator

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As successful as the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been, the therapy is far from perfect. The device implantations are nontrivial and implant testing still has some morbidity and a relatively rare mortality associated with it. Partly due to the high effectiveness of ICDs, the largest morbidity associated with this therapy is psychiatric due to the pain of shocks especially-but not exclusively-due to inappropriate shocks. In spite of the dramatic positive impact on sudden death, patients with ICDs can still die from sudden death because of high defibrillation threshold fibrillation or nonshockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity. This chapter will discuss possibilities for addressing these therapy limitations. © 2009 Springer US.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kroll, M. W., & Swerdlow, C. D. (2009). The future of the implantable defibrillator. In Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications (pp. 551–570). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free