Live attenuated tularemia vaccines for protection against respiratory challenge with virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis

34Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Francisella tularensis is the causative agent of tularemia and a Tier I bioterrorism agent. In the 1900s, several vaccines were developed against tularemia including the killed "Foshay" vaccine, subunit vaccines comprising F. tularensis protein(s) or lipoproteins(s) in an adjuvant formulation, and the F. tularensis Live Vaccine Strain (LVS); none were licensed in the U.S.A. or European Union. The LVS vaccine retains toxicity in humans and animals-especially mice-but has demonstrated efficacy in humans, and thus serves as the current gold standard for vaccine efficacy studies. The U.S.A. 2001 anthrax bioterrorism attack spawned renewed interest in vaccines against potential biowarfare agents including F. tularensis. Since live attenuated-but not killed or subunit-vaccines have shown promising efficacy and since vaccine efficacy against respiratory challenge with less virulent subspecies holarctica or F. novicida, or against non-respiratory challenge with virulent subsp. tularensis (Type A) does not reliably predict vaccine efficacy against respiratory challenge with virulent subsp. tularensis, the route of transmission and species of greatest concern in a bioterrorist attack, in this review, we focus on live attenuated tularemia vaccine candidates tested against respiratory challenge with virulent Type A strains, including homologous vaccines derived from mutants of subsp. holarctica, F. novicida, and subsp. tularensis, and heterologous vaccines developed using viral or bacterial vectors to express F. tularensis immunoprotective antigens. We compare the virulence and efficacy of these vaccine candidates with that of LVS and discuss factors that can significantly impact the development and evaluation of live attenuated tularemia vaccines. Several vaccines meet what we would consider the minimum criteria for vaccines to go forward into clinical development-safety greater than LVS and efficacy at least as great as LVS, and of these, several meet the higher standard of having efficacy ≥ LVS in the demanding mouse model of tularemia. These latter include LVS with deletions in purMCD, sodBFt, capB or wzy; LVS ΔcapB that also overexpresses Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) proteins; FSC200 with a deletion in clpB; the single deletional purMCD mutant of F. tularensis SCHU S4, and a heterologous prime-boost vaccine comprising LVS ΔcapB and Listeria monocytogenes expressing T6SS proteins.

References Powered by Scopus

Tularemia as a biological weapon: Medical and public health management

1253Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biological warfare: A historical perspective

547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Virulent and avirulent strains of Francisella tularensis prevent acidification and maturation of their phagosomes and escape into the cytoplasm in human macrophages

297Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa–host interactions: The ongoing quest for an efficacious vaccine

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dangerous pathogens as a potential problem for public health

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tularemia goes west: Epidemiology of an emerging infection in Austria

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jia, Q., & Horwitz, M. A. (2018, May 15). Live attenuated tularemia vaccines for protection against respiratory challenge with virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00154

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

17%

Researcher 4

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

39%

Immunology and Microbiology 9

32%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free