Are metabolites of l-deprenyl (selegiline) useful or harmful? Indications from preclinical research

38Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A frequent topic of controversy has been whether metabolism of l-deprenyl (selegiline) to active metabolites is a detriment to clinical use. This paper reviews possible roles of the metabolites of l-deprenyl in producing unwanted adverse side effects or in augmenting or mediating its clinically useful actions. Levels of l-amphetamine and l-methamphetamine likely to be reached, even with excessive intake of l-deprenyl, would be unlikely to produce neurotoxicity and there is no preclinical or clinical evidence of abuse liability of l-deprenyl. In contrast, there is evidence that l-amphetamine and l-methamphetamine have some qualitatively different actions than their disomer counterparts on EEG and cognitive functioning which might result in beneficial clinical effects and complement beneficial clinical actions of l-deprenyl itself.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yasar, S., Goldberg, J. P., & Goldberg, S. R. (1996). Are metabolites of l-deprenyl (selegiline) useful or harmful? Indications from preclinical research. Journal of Neural Transmission, Supplement. Springer-Verlag Wien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7494-4_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free