Antibiotic Use in Dental Implant Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This project was developed from anecdotal evidence of varied practices around antibiotic prescribing in dental procedures. The aim of the study was to ascertain if there is evidence to support whether antibiotic (AB) use can effectively reduce postoperative infections after dental implant placements (DIPs). Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA-P© methodology, a systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials was designed and registered on the PROSPERO© database. Searches were performed using PubMed®, Science Direct® and the Cochrane© Database, plus the bibliographies of studies identified. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics, independent of the regimen used, versus a placebo, control or no therapy based on implant failure due to infection was the primary measured outcome. Secondary outcomes were other post-surgical complications due to infection and AB adverse events. Results: Twelve RCTs were identified and analysed. Antibiotic use was reported to be statistically significant in preventing infection (p < 001). The prevention of complications was not statistically significant (p = 0.96), and the NNT was >5 (14 and 2523 respectively), which indicates that the intervention was not sufficiently effective to justify its use. The occurrence of side effects was not statistically significant (p = 0.63). NNH was 528 indicating that possible harm caused by the use of ABs is very small and does not negate the AB use when indicated. Conclusion: The routine use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infection in dental implant placement was found to be not sufficiently effective to justify routine use. Clear clinical assessment pathways, such as those used for medical conditions, based on the patients’ age, dental risk factors, such as oral health and bone health, physical risk factors, such as chronic or long-term conditions and modifiable health determinants, such as smoking, are required to prevent the unnecessary use of antibiotics.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

48741Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

45988Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis

2917Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Is routine antibiotic prophylaxis warranted in dental implant surgery to prevent early implant failure? – a systematic review

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpretation using PRISMA 2020 methodology of antibiotic use in dentistry

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Multicenter Study of Factors Related to Early Implant Failures—Part 1: Implant Materials and Surgical Techniques

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Torof, E., Morrissey, H., & Ball, P. A. (2023, April 1). Antibiotic Use in Dental Implant Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Lithuania). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040713

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

73%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Chemistry 1

7%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free