Sequential Potential Outcome Models to Analyze the Effects of Fertility on Labor Market Outcomes

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper proposes to use dynamic treatment models to analyze the effects of fertility on labor market interactions. It argues that when large data sets are available the dynamic potential outcome model is an interesting modeling framework because it allows the careful consideration of the selection issues coming from the interaction of fertility and labor market decisions at different ages. It allows explicitly considering their dependence on the labor market and fertility history realized up to that period. There is no need to collapse the ‘endogeneity’ problem into a static setting since the dynamic nature and timing of the interaction can be explicitly addressed. Furthermore, the paper argues that this approach allows defining relevant parameters of interest in a more precise way. Based on artificial data, the approach is implemented and issues that may come up in practical applications of this approach are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

21305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies

5611Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistics and causal inference

3556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of the timing of childbirth on female labor supply: an analysis using the sequential matching approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lechner, M. (2009). Sequential Potential Outcome Models to Analyze the Effects of Fertility on Labor Market Outcomes. In Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis (Vol. 23, pp. 31–57). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9967-0_3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

67%

Arts and Humanities 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free