Characteristics of individuals who frequently use emergency departments in Hong Kong: a regionbased cohort study

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: This study analysed the characteristics and healthcare needs of emergency department (ED) users, and identified factors that contribute to frequent ED use. Methods: Using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System of the Hospital Authority, we identified all patients and visits to three EDs in the New Territories West Cluster from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019. Individuals with 4 to 9 ED visits and ≥10 ED visits were defined as frequent users (FUs) and high-intensity users (HIUs), respectively; they were compared with normal users (NUs, 1-3 visits) in terms of demographics, underlying disease, and outcomes. Visits by these users were also compared in terms of demographics, urgency, investigations performed, nature of complaint, and admission statistics. Results: In total, FUs and HIUs constituted 9% of ED users but represented 27.2% of all visits. Compared with NUs, FUs and HIUs were older, more likely to have a payment exemption, and more likely to have underlying physical and mental health disorders. Compared with NUs, FUs were more likely to require ambulance services (17.9% vs 23.9%; P<0.001), be triaged as urgent or above (31.8% vs 38.1%; P<0.001), and require hospitalisation (28.5% vs 35.7%; P<0.001). Conclusion: Individuals who frequently use EDs are more likely to be in poor health and require medical attention. Additional community-or ED-based support systems for discharge planning and support, along with reduced barriers to alternative sources of care, would improve health in these individuals and help reduce ED utilisation burden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ng, P. Y. T., Lui, C. T., Lau, C. L., Fung, H. T., Lai, C. H., & Lee, L. Y. (2023). Characteristics of individuals who frequently use emergency departments in Hong Kong: a regionbased cohort study. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 29(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj219460

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free