UtahBMI at SemEval-2016 task 12: Extracting temporal information from clinical text

19Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The 2016 Clinical TempEval continued the 2015 shared task on temporal information extraction with a new evaluation test set. Our team, UtahBMI, participated in all subtasks using machine learning approaches with ClearTK (LIBLINEAR), CRF++ and CRF-suite packages. Our experiments show that CRF-based classifiers yield, in general, higher recall for multi-word spans, while SVM-based classifiers are better at predicting correct attributes of TIMEX3. In addition, we show that an ensemble-based approach for TIMEX3 could yield improved results. Our team achieved competitive results in each subtask with an F1 75.4% for TIMEX3, F1 89.2% for EVENT, F1 84.4% for event relations with document time (DocTimeRel), and F1 51.1% for narrative container (CONTAINS) relations.

References Powered by Scopus

Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): Architecture, component evaluation and applications

1451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research.

663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

UIMA: An architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment

657Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

SemEval-2016 task 12: Clinical TempEval

156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neural architecture for temporal relation extraction: A Bi-LSTM approach for detecting narrative containers

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khalifa, A., Velupillai, S., & Meystre, S. (2016). UtahBMI at SemEval-2016 task 12: Extracting temporal information from clinical text. In SemEval 2016 - 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings (pp. 1256–1262). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s16-1195

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

73%

Researcher 8

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 41

79%

Linguistics 6

12%

Engineering 3

6%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free