Comparing the Performance of Different Classifiers for Posture Detection

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Human Posture Classification (HPC) is used in many fields such as human computer interfacing, security surveillance, rehabilitation, remote monitoring, and so on. This paper compares the performance of different classifiers in the detection of 3 postures, sitting, standing, and lying down, which was recorded using Microsoft Kinect cameras. The Machine Learning classifiers used included the Support Vector Classifier, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Random Forests. The Deep Learning ones included the standard Multi-Layer Perceptron, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Long Short Term Memory Networks (LSTM). It was observed that Deep Learning methods outperformed the former and that the one-dimensional CNN performed the best with an accuracy of 93.45%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suresh Kumar, S., Dashtipour, K., Gogate, M., Ahmad, J., Assaleh, K., Arshad, K., … Ahmad, W. (2022). Comparing the Performance of Different Classifiers for Posture Detection. In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST (Vol. 420 LNICST, pp. 210–218). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95593-9_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free