Optimization of surface roughness in turning of GFRP composites using genetic algorithm

  • Hussain S
  • Pandurangadu V
  • Kumar K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Glass fiber reinforced polymer composites are finding its increased applications in variety of engineering applications such as aerospace, automobile, electronics and other industries. However, the users of FRP are facing difficulties to machine it, because of fiber delamination, fiber pull out, short tool life, matrix debonding and formation of powder like chips. The present investigation focuses on the optimization of process parameters for surface roughness of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites using Genetic Algorithm (GA). Experiments are conducted based on the established Taguchi’s L25 orthogonal array in Design of Experiments (DOE) on an all-geared lathe using poly-crystalline diamond (PCD) tool. The process parameters considered were cutting speed, feed, depth of cut, and work piece (fiber orientation angle). A second order mathematical model was developed for surface roughness prediction using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). An attempt has also been made to optimize the surface roughness prediction model coupling with Genetic Algorithm (GA) to optimize the objective function. Validation of the optimized results was also performed by confirmation experiments.Keywords: GFRP composites, Response surface methodology (RSM), Poly crystalline diamond (PCD), surface roughness (Ra), Genetic Algorithm (GA).International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology Vol. 6, No. 1, 2014, pp. 49-57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hussain, S. A., Pandurangadu, V., & Kumar, K. P. (2014). Optimization of surface roughness in turning of GFRP composites using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 6(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v6i1.6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 8

80%

Design 1

10%

Materials Science 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free