Comparison of two methods of preventing central nervous system leukemia

139Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This controlled study of children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) was designed to determine in a prospective manner the relative efficacy and toxicity of two forms of 'prophylactic' central nervous system therapy for preventing CNS relapse and of periodic vincristine prednisone 'pulses' during multiple agent chemotherapy. Following cranial irradiation (2400 rads) plus intrathecal methotrexate, 3 of 45 patients developed CNS leukemia. Following craniospinal irradiation (2400 rads), 2 of 49 developed CNS leukemia. Craniospinal irradiation was associated with more leukopenia and interruptions of chemotherapy. 'Pulses' were not associated with improvement of remission duration. The current choice of CNS therapy is cranial irradiation plus intrathecal methotrexate because it takes less time and may avoid demonstrated short term side effects and possible long term effects of spinal irradiation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aur, R. J. A., Hustu, H. O., & Verzosa, M. S. (1973). Comparison of two methods of preventing central nervous system leukemia. Blood, 42(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v42.3.349.349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free