A Comparative Study on Mental Disorder Conceptualization: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The conceptualization of mental disorders varies among professionals, impacting diagnosis, treatment, and research. This cross-disciplinary study aimed to understand how various professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, medical students, philosophers, and social sciences experts, perceive mental disorders, their attitudes towards the disease status of certain mental states, and their emphasis on biological versus social explanatory attributions. A survey of 371 participants assessed their agreement on a variety of conceptual statements and the relative influence of biological or social explanatory attribution for different mental states. Our findings revealed a consensus on the need for multiple explanatory perspectives in understanding psychiatric conditions and the influence of social, cultural, moral, and political values on diagnosis and classification. Psychiatrists demonstrated balanced bio-social explanatory attributions for various mental conditions, indicating a potential shift from the biological attribution predominantly observed among medical students and residents in psychiatry. Further research into factors influencing these differing perspectives is necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jerotic, S., Ignjatovic, N., Maric, N. P., Nesic, J., Jovandic, Z., Latas, M., … Aftab, A. (2024). A Comparative Study on Mental Disorder Conceptualization: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis. Community Mental Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01240-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free