Discourse-sensitive automatic identification of generic expressions

14Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes a novel sequence labeling method for identifying generic expressions, which refer to kinds or arbitrary members of a class, in discourse context. The automatic recognition of such expressions is important for any natural language processing task that requires text understanding. Prior work has focused on identifying generic noun phrases; we present a new corpus in which not only subjects but also clauses are annotated for genericity according to an annotation scheme motivated by semantic theory. Our contextaware approach for automatically identifying generic expressions uses conditional random fields and outperforms previous work based on local decisions when evaluated on this corpus and on related data sets (ACE-2 and ACE-2005).

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60536Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters

6566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Situation entity types: Automatic classification of clause-level aspect

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Decomposing Generalization Models of Generic, Habitual, and Episodic Statements

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Classifying semantic clause types: Modeling context and genre characteristics with recurrent neural networks and attention

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedrich, A., & Pinkal, M. (2015). Discourse-sensitive automatic identification of generic expressions. In ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1272–1281). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p15-1123

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

63%

Researcher 10

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 48

77%

Linguistics 8

13%

Engineering 3

5%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free