Concurrent task management and prospective memory: Pilot error as a model for the vulnerability of experts

19Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In five of the 27 major U.S. airline accidents between 1987 and 2001 in which the NTSB found crew error to be a causal factor, inadvertent omission of a normal procedural step played a pivotal role. Such omissions are a form of prospective memory error. My research group is attempting to link real-world prospective memory phenomena with task demands and with underlying cognitive processes. I briefly summarize studies from three quite different but complementary approaches: ethnographic studies, analyses of accident and incident reports, and laboratory studies. Five types of situation presented prospective memory challenges: episodic tasks, habitual tasks, atypical actions substituted for habitual actions, interrupted tasks, and interleaving tasks/monitoring. An experimental study found that inadequate encoding, inadequate cueing, and competing demands for attention make individuals vulnerable to forgetting to resume interrupted tasks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dismukes, K. (2006). Concurrent task management and prospective memory: Pilot error as a model for the vulnerability of experts. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 909–913). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000910

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free