A novel noninvasive method to detect rejection after heart transplantation

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prompt and accurate detection of rejection prior to pathological changes after organ transplantation is vital for monitoring rejections. Although biopsy remains the current gold standard for rejection diagnosis, it is an invasive method and cannot be repeated daily. Thus, noninvasive monitoring methods are needed. In this study, by introducing an IL-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibody (IL-2 N-mAb) and immunosuppressants into the culture with the presence of specifc stimulators and activated lymphocytes, an activated lymphocyte-specifc assay (ALSA) system was established to detect the specifc activated lymphocytes. This assay demonstrated that the suppression in the ALSA test was closely related to the existence of specifc activated lymphocytes. The ALSA test was applied to 47 heart graft recipients and the proliferation of activated lymphocytes from all rejection recipients proven by endomyocardial biopsies was found to be inhibited by spleen cells from the corresponding donors, suggesting that this suppression could refect the existence of activated lymphocytes against donor antigens, and thus the rejection of a heart graft. The sensitivity of the ALSA test in these 47 heart graft recipients was 100%; however, the specifcity was only 37.5%. It was also demonstrated that IL-2 N-mAb was indispensible, and the proper culture time courses and concentrations of stimulators were essential for the ALSA test. This preliminary study with 47 grafts revealed that the ALSA test was a promising noninvasive tool, which could be used in vitro to assist with the diagnosis of rejection post-heart transplantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, J., Xie, X., Li, Y., Wang, S., Feng, Q., Wang, X., & Liang, D. (2012). A novel noninvasive method to detect rejection after heart transplantation. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 45(12), 1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free