Temperature and decisions: Evidence from 207,000 court cases

97Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyze the impact of outdoor temperature on high-stakes decisions (immigration adjudications) made by professional decision- makers (US immigration judges). In our preferred specification, which includes spatial, temporal, and judge fixed effects, and controls for various potential confounders, a 10°F degree increase in case-day temperature reduces decisions favorable to the applicant by 6.55 percent. This is despite judgements being made indoors, "protected " by climate control. Results are consistent with established links from temperature to mood and risk appetite and have important implications for evaluating the influence of climate on "cognitive output." (JEL K37, K41, Q54)2019 copy American Economic Journal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heyes, A., & Saberian, S. (2019). Temperature and decisions: Evidence from 207,000 court cases. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(2), 238–265. https://doi.org/10.1257/APP.20170223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free