Comparison of the clinical presentation across two waves of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

23Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Only a few studies have performed comprehensive comparisons between hospitalized patients from different waves of COVID-19. Thus, we aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory data of patients admitted to the western part of Denmark during the first and second waves of COVID-19 in 2020. Furthermore, we aimed to identify risk factors for critical COVID-19 disease and to describe the available information on the sources of infection. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of medical records from 311 consecutive hospitalized patients, 157 patients from wave 1 and 154 patients from wave 2. The period from March 7 to June 30, 2020, was considered wave 1, and the period from July 1st to December 31, 2020, was considered wave 2. Data are presented as the total study population, as a comparison between waves 1 and 2, and as a comparison between patients with and without critical COVID-19 disease (nonsurvivors and patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)). Results: Patients admitted during the first COVID-19 wave experienced a more severe course of disease than patients admitted during wave 2. Admissions to the ICU and fatal disease were significantly higher among patients admitted during wave 1 compared to wave 2. The percentage of patients infected at hospital decreased in wave 2 compared to wave 1, whereas more patients were infected at home during wave 2. We found no significant differences in sociodemographics, lifestyle information, or laboratory data in the comparison of patients from waves 1 and 2. However, age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, fever, and dyspnea were identified as risk factors for critical COVID-19 disease. Furthermore, we observed significantly increased levels of C-reactive protein and creatinine, and lower hemoglobin levels among patients with critical disease. Conclusions: At admission, patients were more severely ill during wave 1 than during wave 2, and the outcomes were worse during wave 1. We confirmed previously identified risk factors for critical COVID-19 disease. In addition, we found that most COVID-19 infections were acquired at home.

References Powered by Scopus

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

35666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

21544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

20027Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparative Study of the Myocardium of Patients from Four COVID-19 Waves

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

COVID-19 in Iran: clinical presentations and outcomes in three different surges of COVID-19 infection

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Impact of Demographic, Clinical Characteristics and the Various COVID-19 Variant Types on All-Cause Mortality: A Case-Series Retrospective Study

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buttenschøn, H. N., Lynggaard, V., Sandbøl, S. G., Glassou, E. N., & Haagerup, A. (2022). Comparison of the clinical presentation across two waves of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07413-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Researcher 5

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Engineering 2

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free