Hybrid enhanced universal dependencies parsing

7Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes our system to predict enhanced dependencies for Universal Dependencies (UD) treebanks, which ranked 2nd in the Shared Task on Enhanced Dependency Parsing with an average ELAS of 82.60%. Our system uses a hybrid two-step approach. First, we use a graph-based parser to extract a basic syntactic dependency tree. Then, we use a set of linguistic rules which generate the enhanced dependencies for the syntactic tree. The application of these rules is optimized using a classifier which predicts their suitability in the given context. A key advantage of this approach is its language independence, as rules rely solely on dependency trees and UPOS tags which are shared across all languages.

References Powered by Scopus

Tokenizing, POS tagging, lemmatizing and parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe

466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conll 2018 shared task: Multilingual parsing from raw text to universal dependencies

282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

UDPIPE 2.0 prototype at Conll 2018 UD Shared Task

198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sculpting Enhanced Dependencies for Belarusian

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Corpus Study of Creating Rule-Based Enhanced Universal Dependencies for German

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinecke, J. (2020). Hybrid enhanced universal dependencies parsing. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 174–180). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.iwpt-1.18

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

62%

Researcher 6

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 16

62%

Linguistics 8

31%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0