Comparative Analysis of Mixed Integer Programming Formulations for Single-Machine and Parallel-Machine Scheduling Problems

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study evaluates various Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) formulations for solving single-machine and parallel-machine scheduling problems, with the objective of minimizing the total completion time and the makespan of jobs. Through extensive numerical study, the MIP formulation, which is suitable for dealing with each specific single-machine or parallel-machine scheduling problem, is identified. Benchmarks are also provided for the development of other algorithms for future research.

References Powered by Scopus

Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey

4846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formulating the single machine sequencing problem with release dates as a mixed integer program

191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structure of a simple scheduling polyhedron

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A New Multi-Objective Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Method to Fully Utilize the Residual Forging Heat

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reclaimer Scheduling in Dry Bulk Terminals

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applications of Stochastic Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Optimization

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ying, K. C., Cheng, C. Y., Lin, S. W., & Hung, C. Y. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Mixed Integer Programming Formulations for Single-Machine and Parallel-Machine Scheduling Problems. IEEE Access, 7, 152998–153011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947685

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

50%

Computer Science 2

25%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0