Against reification! Praxeological methodology and its benefits

12Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As early as the 1920s, Mannheim (1980, p. 84) criticized the way natural-scientific psychology had anchored is logic of empirical research. Unlike many others, however, he was able to successfully work out his own theories. His work co-founded a research tradition, which is currently of great interest to the social sciences; psychology, however, has remained largely unaffected. For Mannheim, the essential one-sidedness of nomothetic, natural-scientifically oriented methodology lies in its hypostatizing "one type of knowledge"-i.e., theoretical knowledge, abstracted from existential relations and exclusively geared towards universal validity, as it is-"as knowledge per se" and "one type of concepts-the so-called exact concepts, which have their origin [...] in definitions"; (Mannheim, 1982, p. 217)-as the only type of concept suitable for scientific endeavour. © 2009 Springer-Verlag New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Przyborski, A., & Slunecko, T. (2009). Against reification! Praxeological methodology and its benefits. In Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences (pp. 141–170). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free