Research on the Evaluation of Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on the AHP-CRITIC Empowerment Method

23Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, two districts, Erdaojiang District and Dongchang District, in Tonghua City, Jilin Province, were evaluated for their geological environment carrying capacity. A total of 14 evaluation indicators were selected from the three aspects of the geological environment, ecological environment, and social environment to make it more comprehensive to evaluate the carrying capacity of the geological environment. Using the AHP and CRITIC methods, the subjective weight and objective weight of each evaluation index are obtained, and the combined weight is calculated by game theory. When combined with the GIS and combined weights, the distribution map of the geological environment carrying capacity is obtained, and it is classified into four grades: excellent, good, medium, and poor. A comprehensive evaluation of the carrying capacity of the geological environment is carried out. The following conclusions are drawn: the overall carrying capacity of the geological environment in the study area is good, and the carrying capacity of individual areas is poor. The comparative analysis of the good and poor areas provides a scientific basis for future environmental governance and urban planning and provides a scientific basis for geological disasters and mines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qi, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Duan, C., … Pan, Z. (2022). Research on the Evaluation of Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on the AHP-CRITIC Empowerment Method. Land, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free