Multi-input Recurrent Independent Mechanisms for leveraging knowledge sources: Case studies on sentiment analysis and health text mining

6Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a way to inject and leverage existing knowledge from external sources in a Deep Learning environment, extending the recently proposed Recurrent Independent Mechnisms (RIMs) architecture, which comprises a set of interacting yet independent modules. We show that this extension of the RIMs architecture is an effective framework with lower parameter implications compared to purely fine-tuned systems.

References Powered by Scopus

DrugBank 5.0: A major update to the DrugBank database for 2018

6016Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis

2588Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Independently Recurrent Neural Network (IndRNN): Building A Longer and Deeper RNN

758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-label classification for biomedical literature: An overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19 literature topic annotations

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic Extraction of Medication Mentions from Tweets - Overview of the BioCreative VII Shared Task 3 Competition

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Affective Multi-modal Conversational Agent for Non Intrusive Data Collection from Patients with Brain Diseases

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagherzadeh, P., & Bergler, S. (2021). Multi-input Recurrent Independent Mechanisms for leveraging knowledge sources: Case studies on sentiment analysis and health text mining. In Deep Learning Inside Out: 2nd Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures, DeeLIO 2021 - Proceedings, co-located with the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL-HLT 2021 (pp. 108–118). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.deelio-1.11

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

18%

Researcher 3

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 13

68%

Linguistics 4

21%

Neuroscience 1

5%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0