Disparities in integrating non-invasive prenatal testing into antenatal healthcare in Australia: a survey of healthcare professionals

2Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been clinically available in Australia on a user-pays basis since 2012. There are numerous providers, with available tests ranging from targeted NIPT (only trisomies 21, 18, and 13 +/- sex chromosome aneuploidy) to genome-wide NIPT. While NIPT is being implemented in the public health care systems of other countries, in Australia, the implementation of NIPT has proceeded without public funding. The aim of this study was to investigate how NIPT has been integrated into antenatal care across Australia and reveal the successes and challenges in its implementation in this context. Methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted from September to October 2022. Invitations to participate were sent to healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the provision of NIPT in Australia through professional society mailing lists and networks. Participants were asked questions on their knowledge of NIPT, delivery of NIPT, and post-test management of results. Results: A total of 475 HCPs responded, comprising 232 (48.8%) obstetricians, 167 (35.2%) general practitioners, 32 (6.7%) midwives, and 44 (9.3%) genetic specialists. NIPT was most commonly offered as a first-tier test, with most HCPs (n = 279; 60.3%) offering it to patients as a choice between NIPT and combined first-trimester screening. Fifty-three percent (n = 245) of respondents always offered patients a choice between NIPT for the common autosomal trisomies and expanded (including genome-wide) NIPT. This choice was understood as supporting patient autonomy and informed consent. Cost was seen as a major barrier to access to NIPT, for both targeted and expanded tests. Equitable access, increasing time demands on HCPs, and staying up to date with advances were frequently reported as major challenges in delivering NIPT. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate substantial variation in the clinical implementation of NIPT in Australia, including in the offers of expanded screening options. After a decade of clinical use, Australian clinicians still report ongoing challenges in the clinical and equitable provision of NIPT.

References Powered by Scopus

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: Challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How socioeconomic status affects patient perceptions of health care: A qualitative study

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Should the scope of NIPT be limited by a ‘threshold of seriousness’?

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

‘Screening should not be based on ability to pay’: Australian healthcare providers' and consumers' perspectives on public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnston, M., Hui, L., Bowman-Smart, H., Taylor-Sands, M., Pertile, M. D., & Mills, C. (2024). Disparities in integrating non-invasive prenatal testing into antenatal healthcare in Australia: a survey of healthcare professionals. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06565-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

100%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free