Early versus late hysteroscopic resection after high-intensity focused ultrasound for retained placenta accreta

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To compare early and late hysteroscopic resection after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for retained placenta accreta. Methods: This retrospective study included 63 women with retained placenta accreta who were treated with HIFU combined with hysteroscopic resection. They were divided into an early group (n = 40) and a late group (n = 23), depending on the time between the HIFU and the hysteroscopic resection. The number of sessions of hysteroscopy needed, adverse events, menstrual recovery, and reproductive outcomes were compared. Results: The mean largest diameter of the retained placenta accreta was 67.6 ± 14.0 mm and 71.6 ± 23.6 mm in each group (p =.47), respectively. In the early group, the first hysteroscopic procedure was done at a mean interval of 2.7 ± 1.4 days after HIFU ablation, while in the late group, the interval was 34.7 ± 15.0 days (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, S., Xue, M., & Jiang, J. (2021). Early versus late hysteroscopic resection after high-intensity focused ultrasound for retained placenta accreta. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 38(1), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1887943

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free