Functional Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome: Poorly Understood and Frequently Missed? A Review of Clinical Features, Appropriate Investigations, and Treatment Options

  • Hislop M
  • Kennedy D
  • Cramp B
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Functional popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is an important and possibly underrecognized cause of exertional leg pain (ELP). As it is poorly understood, it is at risk of misdiagnosis and mismanagement. The features indicative of PAES are outlined, as it can share features with other causes of ELP. Investigating functional PAES is also fraught with potential problems and if it is performed incorrectly, it can result in false negative and false positive findings. A review of the current vascular investigations is provided, highlighting some of the limitations standard tests have in determining functional PAES. Once a clinical suspicion for PAES is satisfied, it is necessary to further distinguish the subcategories of anatomical and functional entrapment and the group of asymptomatic occluders. When definitive entrapment is confirmed, it is important to identify the level of entrapment so that precise intervention can be performed. Treatment strategies for functional PAES are discussed, including the possibility of a new, less invasive intervention of guided Botulinum toxin injection at the level of entrapment as an alternative to vascular surgery.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hislop, M., Kennedy, D., Cramp, B., & Dhupelia, S. (2014). Functional Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome: Poorly Understood and Frequently Missed? A Review of Clinical Features, Appropriate Investigations, and Treatment Options. Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/105953

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

52%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

29%

Researcher 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

77%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

17%

Design 1

3%

Sports and Recreations 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 20

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free