Four parameters for measuring democratic deliberation: Theoretical and methodological challenges and how to respond

15Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although measuring democratic deliberation is necessary for a valid measurement of the performance of democracies, it poses serious theoretical and methodological challenges. The most serious problem in the context of research on democratic performance is the need for a theoretical and methodological approach for “upscaling” the measurement of deliberation from the micro and meso level to the macro level. The systemic approach offers a useful framework for this purpose. Building on this framework, this article offers a modular approach consisting of four parameters for conceptualization, measurement, and aggregation which can be adjusted to make the measurement of democratic deliberation compatible with the various general measurement approaches adopted by different scholars.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fleuß, D., Helbig, K., & Schaal, G. S. (2018). Four parameters for measuring democratic deliberation: Theoretical and methodological challenges and how to respond. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free