A critical review of which children with acute myeloid leukaemia need stem cell procedures

58Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The last decades have seen parallel improvements in chemotherapy-based and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) regimens for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in children. There has been no consensus on indication for HSCT. Reserving HSCT for high-risk and relapsed patients spare many patients from the long-term toxicity of this treatment. The results of matched unrelated donor HSCT equal family donor transplantation and the presence of a matched sibling should no longer be a transplant indication. Minimal residual disease measured by flow cytometry may identify poor responders benefitting from HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) and those with a favourable response to induction therapy who do not need HSCT even with adverse cytogenetic aberrations. FLT3-internal tandem duplication without NPM1 mutation has a very high relapse rate despite favourable response and HSCT is indicated in CR1 in these cases. Finding the optimal indications for HSCT is a delicate balance between risk of relapse and late effects. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasle, H. (2014). A critical review of which children with acute myeloid leukaemia need stem cell procedures. British Journal of Haematology, 166(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12900

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free