International Relations theory has its own form of identity politics. Although coming under recent critique, the notion that theorists occupy ‘-isms’ that form essential parts of their academic identity is tenacious. Where does Chris Brown fit within this theoretical landscape, and what can we learn in a broader sense from examining this issue? This chapter argues that Brown does not fit easily into any of the prevailing theoretical categories and that his dogmatic anti-dogmatism on this issue provides us with a model for pluralism in International Relations (IR). Brown provides a paradigmatic model of an eclectic critical thinker, who applies the reflexive moment to his own thinking in ways that few critical theorists can match.
CITATION STYLE
Wight, C. (2018). Dogmatic anti-dogmatism: Learning from Chris Brown. In The Politics of International Political Theory: Reflections on the Works of Chris Brown (pp. 21–37). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93278-1_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.