A Comparative Study of Active and Passive Learning Approaches in Hybrid Learning, Undergraduate, Educational Programs

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article is devoted to teachers who are working on active and passive learning. It aims to evaluate teaching methods, workload, rhythm and the dynamic of teachers in a hybrid learning context, remotely using Moodle and face-to-face methods as e-learning platform. A comparison will be made between two learning approaches Active and passive learning by using a quantitative and qualitative study. We compare results from survey study of Experimental Physics in which students are put in learning-by-doing contexts following the scientific method, and Classical Physics-Chemistry which used passive learning method. A sample of 108 students out of 183 from the School of Industrial Management (EMINES) of Mohammed VI Polytechnic University presently was drawn using random, proportionate, stratified sampling techniques. The findings revealed that there is a significant relationship between workloads and dynamic and no significant relationship between rhythm of learning and teaching methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baba, K., Cheimanoff, N., & El Faddouli, N. eddine. (2020). A Comparative Study of Active and Passive Learning Approaches in Hybrid Learning, Undergraduate, Educational Programs. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1228 AISC, pp. 715–725). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52249-0_48

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free