Neural Network Verification Using Residual Reasoning

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the increasing integration of neural networks as components in mission-critical systems, there is an increasing need to ensure that they satisfy various safety and liveness requirements. In recent years, numerous sound and complete verification methods have been proposed towards that end, but these typically suffer from severe scalability limitations. Recent work has proposed enhancing such verification techniques with abstraction-refinement capabilities, which have been shown to boost scalability: instead of verifying a large and complex network, the verifier constructs and then verifies a much smaller network, whose correctness implies the correctness of the original network. A shortcoming of such a scheme is that if verifying the smaller network fails, the verifier needs to perform a refinement step that increases the size of the network being verified, and then start verifying the new network from scratch—effectively “wasting” its earlier work on verifying the smaller network. In this paper, we present an enhancement to abstraction-based verification of neural networks, by using residual reasoning: the process of utilizing information acquired when verifying an abstract network, in order to expedite the verification of a refined network. In essence, the method allows the verifier to store information about parts of the search space in which the refined network is guaranteed to behave correctly, and allows it to focus on areas where bugs might be discovered. We implemented our approach as an extension to the Marabou verifier, and obtained promising results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elboher, Y. Y., Cohen, E., & Katz, G. (2022). Neural Network Verification Using Residual Reasoning. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 13550 LNCS, pp. 173–189). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17108-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free