Investment case for malaria elimination in South Africa: a financing model for resource mobilization to accelerate regional malaria elimination

16Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Malaria continues to be a public health problem in South Africa. While the disease is mainly confined to three of the nine provinces, most local transmissions occur because of importation of cases from neighbouring countries. The government of South Africa has reiterated its commitment to eliminate malaria within its borders. To support the achievement of this goal, this study presents a cost–benefit analysis of malaria elimination in South Africa through simulating different scenarios aimed at achieving malaria elimination within a 10-year period. Methods: A dynamic mathematical transmission model was developed to estimate the costs and benefits of malaria elimination in South Africa between 2018 and 2030. The model simulated a range of malaria interventions and estimated their impact on the transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria between 2018 and 2030 in the three endemic provinces of Limpopo, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal. Local financial, economic, and epidemiological data were used to calibrate the transmission model. Results: Based on the three primary simulated scenarios: Business as Usual, Accelerate and Source Reduction, the total economic burden was estimated as follows: for the Business as Usual scenario, the total economic burden of malaria in South Africa was R 3.69 billion (USD 223.3 million) over an 11-year period (2018–2029). The economic burden of malaria was estimated at R4.88 billion (USD 295.5 million) and R6.34 billion (~ USD 384 million) for the Accelerate and Source Reduction scenarios, respectively. Costs and benefits are presented in midyear 2020 values. Malaria elimination was predicted to occur in all three provinces if the Source Reduction strategy was adopted to help reduce malaria rates in southern Mozambique. This could be achieved by limiting annual local incidence in South Africa to less than 1 indigenous case with a prediction of this goal being achieved by the year 2026. Conclusions: Malaria elimination in South Africa is feasible and economically worthwhile with a guaranteed positive return on investment (ROI). Findings of this study show that through securing funding for the proposed malaria interventions in the endemic areas of South Africa and neighbouring Mozambique, national elimination could be within reach in an 8-year period.

References Powered by Scopus

Global health 2035: A world converging within a generation

897Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): An open-label, randomised trial

768Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H genotypes with delayed parasite clearance in Rwanda: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, therapeutic efficacy study

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Climate change and malaria: some recent trends of malaria incidence rates and average annual temperature in selected sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2018

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global Cross-Border Malaria Control Collaborative Initiatives: A Scoping Review

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting malaria outbreaks from sea surface temperature variability up to 9 months ahead in Limpopo, South Africa, using machine learning

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Njau, J., Silal, S. P., Kollipara, A., Fox, K., Balawanth, R., Yuen, A., … Moonasar, D. (2021). Investment case for malaria elimination in South Africa: a financing model for resource mobilization to accelerate regional malaria elimination. Malaria Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03875-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

65%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

22%

Researcher 5

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

23%

Immunology and Microbiology 3

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 18

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free